home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- From: ekl@sdf.lonestar.org (Evan K. Langlois)
- Subject: GEM/X
- Date: Tue, 18 Jan 94 15:36:10 CST
-
-
- ====================================
- X is a nice ideal, but it's barely practical on a TT, let alone a Falcon
- or <gasp> an ST. GEM is sleek. GEM is pretty weak too, but that's what
- you get in exchange for speed.
- ====================================
-
- What about NeXT ? X uses by far the most CPU resources, and GEM the least,
- so what about something in between .. like the NeXT GUI? It could be
- simulated either by adding to GEM, or rewrite GEM to call NeXT-like objects.
-
-
-